POLITICS: A ‘NATIONAL DEBT’ primer

A large national debt is a very serious problem for a country.

Canada’s national debt is over $60 billion, with more than $16B slotted for the Indigenous and another $1.5B for increased border security because of T****’s 25% tariff threat. The Liberals would have exacerbated the debt if the NDP and Conservatives had not rejected the promise of a government handout of a $250 cheque to Canadians. [Don’t go praising those latter two parties. They rejected the proposal because it wasn’t expansive enough, excluding seniors and disabled people.

What does a large national debt mean?

A large national debt can significantly impact a country’s economy and its citizens in various ways. Here are the key implications:

Economic Growth and Investment

  • Reduced Economic Growth:
    High levels of national debt can slow down economic growth. More money allocated to interest payments means less is available for essential public investments in areas like education, infrastructure, and research and development.
  • Vicious Debt Cycle:
    This can create a cycle where rising debt hampers growth, leading to even more borrowing.
  • “Crowding Out” Effect:
    Higher debt -> means higher interest rates -> means increased borrowing. This discourages businesses from investing in growth opportunities.
  • Employment problems:
    Particularly concerning more debt means less job creation and innovation.
  • Fiscal Flexibility and Crisis Management:
    Limited Fiscal Flexibility -> a country with high national debt has less room to maneuver during economic crises. In the event of a recession or unexpected financial downturn, the government will struggle to implement stimulus measures or support programs due to debt obligations.
  • Fiscal inflexibility:
    The diminished flexibility exacerbates economic downturns.
  • Risk of Debt Crisis:
    Excessive debt increases the vulnerability to a debt crisis, where the government may be unable to meet its obligations. Such crises can lead to severe economic consequences, including austerity measures, reduced public services, and social unrest [Historical examples include the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s and Argentina’s crisis in 2001].
  • Inflation Risks and Interest Rates:
    Inflation Risks: Countries that issue their own currency may face inflation risks if they print money to pay off debts. This was notably seen in Weimar, Germany, in the 1920s.
  • Inflation Rates:
    High debt levels lead to expectations of inflation, which further complicates economic management.
  • Rising Interest Costs:
    As national debt increases, interest payments take a bigger bite out of the federal budget.
  • Spending cuts vs. tax increases:
    The trend of increasing national debt forces governments to make difficult choices between spending cuts and tax increases. They cannot provide both easily.


  • Intergenerational Impact:
    Intergenerational Transfer: National debt often represents a transfer of financial responsibility from current beneficiaries of government spending to future generations who will bear the burden of repayment. This raises ethical questions about fiscal policy and equity among different age groups.

Conclusion
In summary, a very large national debt impacts negatively on a country in many areas:

  • economic growth of a country,
  • its economic growth potential,
  • its fiscal flexibility,
  • its inflation risks, and
  • its intergenerational equity.

Effective national debt management is crucial to ensure sustainable economic health and stability.

This entry was posted in .POLITICS. Bookmark the permalink.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments